News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stanford Pupper: low-cost quadruped robot by andybak on Sunday May 03, 2020 @01:01PM (#23060244)
> the "Nano Dog" is probably a cheaper and more approachable option for the garage engineer.

Hard to find out much about that or OpenDog in general. I've found videos and 3d printer files but nothing that I can read to understand what it can do and why I might want to build it.

Or do I really have to watch a bunch of YouTube videos? I hate video.

Have I missed the actual project page somehow?

Re:Stanford Pupper: low-cost quadruped robot by rspicer on Sunday May 03, 2020 @01:41PM (#23060563)
https://github.com/XRobots/miniDogV2

The code's a bit of a mess -- James is clearly not a software engineer first. This is totally understandable, given that he does so many other things!

When I first saw the code, I thought about doing a refactoring pass and making a pull request. It would be painful to test correctness without the hardware, and I don't want to make things worse, so I haven't.

Re:Stanford Pupper: low-cost quadruped robot by rlayton2 on Sunday May 03, 2020 @08:51PM (#23063312)
It's probably also worth mentioning the project is a work in progress, and from the videos, it looks like OpenDog is likely to undergo at least one more major change before "completion".
Re:Stanford Pupper: low-cost quadruped robot by rspicer on Sunday May 03, 2020 @08:10PM (#23062996)
For future reference, I saw "OpenDog" and thought we were discussing James Bruton's (XRobots) OpenDog/Mini-Dog, which is where the firmware I linked above comes from.

NanoDog is something different, apparently! Sorry for any confusion I might've caused there.

Re:Stanford Pupper: low-cost quadruped robot by monocasa on Sunday May 03, 2020 @02:44PM (#23060981)
Oh wow, you're not joking. I'm getting flashbacks to when I supported a team of EEs.
Re:Stanford Pupper: low-cost quadruped robot by dmoy on Sunday May 03, 2020 @04:23PM (#23061580)
Hell, I'm getting flashbacks to my own code in EE lab. Except this stuff looks way less messy, not nearly enough random assembly declarations to bludgeon a register or pin into submission.
Re:Stanford Pupper: low-cost quadruped robot by t_von_doom on Monday May 04, 2020 @01:20AM (#23064808)
As someone who also isn't a SWE first, what are the changes you'd make and where can one learn to code in a more SWE way?
Re:Stanford Pupper: low-cost quadruped robot by p1necone on Sunday May 03, 2020 @10:49PM (#23064084)
brb building automatic testing environment with dog physics simulation
Re:Stanford Pupper: low-cost quadruped robot by n0us on Sunday May 03, 2020 @01:27PM (#23060462)
Good point, now that I am searching for it I cannot seem to find the code. At the same time it still does not require custom manufactured parts or circuit boards which makes the barrier to entry (and importantly price) a bit lower unless the Stanford folks setup a store.

I make an internet promise here and now that if I ever build the robot I'll open source the source code to control it.