News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why does `True == False is False` evaluate to False in Python? (2013). Parent comment

Re:Why does `True == False is False` evaluate to False in Py... by marcosdumay on Saturday May 02, 2020 @12:09AM (#23049096)
> But chaining the == with other operators feels weird

Chaining anything with `is` feels weird to me, but:

foo >= bar == baz >= fooo

fells perfectly ok.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why does `True == False is False` evaluate to False in Py... by throwaway_pdp09 on Saturday May 02, 2020 @05:21AM (#23050512)
(please ignore, I'm an idiot) (deleted)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why does `True == False is False` evaluate to False in Py... by baq on Saturday May 02, 2020 @05:35AM (#23050568)
Not OP but I’d expect no precedence as I expect this to parse into a series of number comparisons and-chained.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why does `True == False is False` evaluate to False in Py... by throwaway_pdp09 on Saturday May 02, 2020 @06:21AM (#23050794)
Damn, you're right, was being stupid. Duh.
[ Parent | on HN ]