Re:Operating Systems Without Systemd
by microcolonel on Friday May 01, 2020 @10:43PM
(#23048674)
> udev really shouldn't hard depend on systemd. I perfectly understand having some systemd specific integration, but why make it mandatory?
udev is part of systemd now, because the systemd developers were the only ones willing to maintain it.
Re:Operating Systems Without Systemd
by RunningDroid on Saturday May 02, 2020 @03:50PM
(#23054385)
Doesn't the existence of eudev disprove that?
(This is a serious question; I'm not trying to start a fight)
Re:Operating Systems Without Systemd
by microcolonel on Sunday May 03, 2020 @02:23PM
(#23060869)
I think the existence of eudev proves that somebody is now willing to maintain a udev, but it wasn't always the case.
Re:Operating Systems Without Systemd
by TheGoddessInari on Monday May 04, 2020 @09:01PM
(#23075231)
Eudev was forked in the immediate aftermath because systemd only cares about systemd. Even Torvalds strongly criticized systemd-udev maintainership[1].
systemd-resolved is nice if you're using systemd's network configuration system, but it's a pain when you're trying to run your own DNS server.
udev really shouldn't hard depend on systemd. I perfectly understand having some systemd specific integration, but why make it mandatory?
There being said, various people have been working to cut it into separate components (eudev, elogind, etc.)