No, the point of peatmoss's comment is that Linux doesn't lack components or even tools, they lack a cohesive ecosystem. The parts like GOjbect, or KParts, or D-Bus are present but lack cohesion and coordination. The paid teams at Cannonical, IBM/Red Hat, etc all seem to be more concerned with rewriting the core desktop shell's every other release than making a cohesive ecosystem on their chosen tools.

For example, take high DPI. You have two primary competing toolkits between GTK/QT. It took a while but QT/KDE finally added HiDPI. Great, so I could get Hi-DPI setup on KDE! Then I open Firefox and it all falls apart because GTK. Extrapolate to any other number of issues. Unfortunately, Windows 10 isn't much better wrt to HiDPI (at least a couple years back when I last used it). I think there are more different UI toolkits on Windows than Linux has. Counterpoint: MacOS has one global toolkit with message passing based objects, it was almost trivial for Apple to add HiDPI and then dark modes. GNUStep/ObjectiveC would've provided similar basis on Linux, but it never took off. Now macOS is slowly loosing cohesion, instead of ObjectiveC 3.0, they made Swift which from my perspective appears to only be good at adding bugs to the terminal app while trying to avoiding message passing (no more user hot-loadable, un-sactioned third party plugins for any program on macOS :/ ).

At this point, I vaguely dream that HaikuOS will take off or someone makes a WebOS DE for Linux that has a complete suite of tools... but like peatmoss, I'd settle for a Rust/winRT on Linux.

Better said than I could do.

One thing I’ve also thought is that if Linux had managed a first-class GNUStep environment with a compelling alternative to macOS in terms of dev tooling, it could have been great leverage in terms of keeping Apple focused on the core developer experience in macOS.

Counterpoint: Windows is an Operating System. macOS is an Operating System. But Linux is not an Operating System†.

Rather, individual distributions of Linux are Operating Systems. As are the other Unices, e.g. the BSDs, Solaris/Illumos, all the old ones like IRIX, etc. And all of those, at first, built their own Desktop Environment from the ground up, just like Windows and macOS did.

As it happens, through the power of FOSS, many of these Desktop Environment projects were gradually merged, or the various distributions dropped their own DE in favor of someone else's.

But the historical path-dependence is still there, and the political lines are still mostly clear.

Don't think of KDE as "a Linux Desktop Environment." It's both not just for Linux (you can run it on FreeBSD, too!) and also isn't available for every Linux distro. KDE is still fundamentally, in some sense, "SUSE's Desktop Environment."

Same with GNOME: it might have been created by GNU, but it was mostly funded by RedHat and IBM for many years, even if Debian et al eventually picked it up as well.

Same with CDE: that's HP's desktop environment.

If you think of each of these companies as providing their own Operating System with a GUI composed solely of the graphical applications written for their own DE, the continued non-merging of these DEs makes a lot more sense. There's no more reason for them to merge with each-other than for them to merge with e.g. Android. (These OSes all happen to be based on Linux, but that doesn't really mean anything. macOS is based on BSD; should the macOS DE therefore merge with some DE that runs on BSD?)

† Defining "Operating System" here as "a software ecosystem that tries to deliver a cohesive user experience to the people who deploy it."

---

The thing that makes POSIX DEs different from the ones on Windows and macOS, is that you can install multiple DEs' libraries, and then run applications from one DE "under" another DE.

Except for special one-off internal provisions for their own legacy DEs (Carbon; WoW) you can't run software written for another DE "directly" on Windows or macOS. You can only virtualize such software using e.g. Wine, or an X11 server that runs as a window under your DE.

But the fact that Linux can do this, doesn't mean that the software was designed with this in mind. There's no "Linux integrated GUI experience" that all these applications are trying to target (FreeDesktop is forum for "meet in the middle" consensus solutions to be generated when required, not a working group for creating an encompassing standard for everyone to converge toward.) There's just the individual Operating Systems' GUI experiences (plural), where a given GUI app will fit in with the OS it was written for—and maybe with any other OS that happens to share its DE as the primary DE that the system is cohered around.

tl;dr: there is no "Linux." There's just RedHat, Debian, Canonical, openSUSE, Slackware, etc. all with their own goals. And also FreeBSD, NetBSD, Illumos, and whatever wacky proprietary Unices are still in play, who all also run and support these same DEs on very different substrates, with their own even-more-different goals. Each corporate player delivers you their own experience. There's no intent, between these companies, to try to commodify that experience into the same experience. Where would these companies/projects be, if they did?

> WSL is only for those that use Windows to target GNU/Linux, the demography that used to buy macOS to do the same.

Do you know many people that used to do this with macOS and are now using Windows ?

Like, oh boy, I tried, but after 4 months I ended up back with macOS.

In my experience, one of the the problems is that Macs are hilariously underpowered for many modern dev and analytics use cases. So the workaround is to work off remote machines/clusters over web interfaces/SSH but for many development use cases that's just slow and clunky - the have merit more in productionising. The series of hardware clusterfucks on Mac haven't helped ether.

So I've seen Mac users who work in these areas get sick of the issues and limitations and switch to Win 10 + sometimes WSL.

The people remaining with Macs are executive suite (who go for iPad pros) and account execs who do sales where it looks cool to go pull out a Mac. However even there people are increasingly looking dumb when they want to present something and go on 5 min dongle troubleshooting hunt because Mac killed HDMI and VGA ports and start their presentation appearing incompetent. Sometimes over web screen shares, only the desktop shows and not the applications.

By refusing to focus on hardware/software quality and power users, Apple has lost the game on high end.

> In my experience, one of the the problems is that Macs are hilariously underpowered for many modern dev and analytics use cases.

This is what I do and works perfectly. My dev machines are 82 cores xeon platinums with Terabytes of RAM or nodes with 8 V100 GPUs attached, etc.

I don't know of any workstation, much less laptop, that could be a replacement for any of that.

For the stuff I do on the laptop itself (Word/Powerpoint/Outlook, web browsing, using an editor to edit files remotely, etc.), more power wouldn't hurt, but my macbook is a macbook air 2013... so I can't imagine that a 2020 macbook would be underpowered.

Bulk of business analytics and modeling in the world happens in the zone between "regular business laptop" and "82 Core Xeon machines". Laptops with Xeons and reasonably powerful NVIDIA GPUs thrive in that environment.

The CPU and GPU is rarely the problem. The problem is the amount of data to analyze. In a laptop with a 1TB SSD, if I need to analyze 200Gbs of data here and there, I just don't have enough hard-disk space, so I need to SSH somewhere anyways. Once you have to do that, then you might just analyze it there. Bringing it to your laptop makes no sense.

Few years ago I did this transition - I had a MBP that I used for all Unix based things - after realizing how great Ubuntu runs under Hyper-V I just began to use that. It wasn't as seamless but no big deal opening up SecureCrt to connect. Then WSL came along and I used that but found the file system access to be too slow so back to Hyper-V VM. Now that WSL2 is actually a more seamless Hyper-V VM I am planning to just use that. I truly haven't needed a Mac for anything at least 4 years. I do a bunch of Enterprise Java development along with learning Rust etc. - VSCode with Remote Extension Pack makes it all even better.

So you switched from a MBP to a Windows laptop ? (its unclear from all that you wrote) What was the advantage ?