News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ICANN board withholds consent for a change of control of ... by ikiris on Friday May 01, 2020 @03:37AM (#23039899)
If you expect WSJ to not be in favor of hardcore right wing / business interest, then honestly its a lack of perception. They've had that reputation for years. You might consider taking this as an opportunity to reexamine where you believe level-headed and balanced lie in light of this example that you're familiar enough with to see the very large problems in their arguments and general position.
Re:ICANN board withholds consent for a change of control of ... by dannyw on Friday May 01, 2020 @04:33AM (#23040174)
Absolutely. The general quality and of course objectivity of WSJ has gone downhill for years. It’s not a recent phenomenon.
Re:ICANN board withholds consent for a change of control of ... by souterrain on Friday May 01, 2020 @06:45AM (#23040792)
In this case though, one would assume zero objectivity from any paper. The piece referenced is editorial.
Re:ICANN board withholds consent for a change of control of ... by paulgb on Friday May 01, 2020 @08:16AM (#23041252)
Kind of a lazy one, though. And I say this as a WSJ subscriber who regularly finds the editorials worth reading even when I disagree with them. In this case, it's just knee-jerk anti-anti-capitalism without bothering to understand the nuances of the situation.
Re:ICANN board withholds consent for a change of control of ... by sqldba on Friday May 01, 2020 @07:29AM (#23041004)
Would you say Washington Post is more balanced or about the same?