Walmart demands or strongly encourages that their suppliers not run on AWS, and Amazon is being investigated for spying on FBA data to enrich their own business. Other AWS competitors like B&H don’t host there out of fear of data safety and business continuity.
The worry is not that your provider will hack you, the worry is that your provider will silently steal your trade secrets.
Cryptographic keys that control identity and money are good distilled examples of this.
There's still no evidence that Amazon has ever done this. AFAIK potential customers are more concerned that AWS will use utilization metadata as a proxy for their customers' financials, like Facebook was using Onavo traffic data to decide which startups to buy and which to clone.
What VPS? Do you have to provide it yourself? Or is it assigned to you and managed by someone else? (I see a note in the article about "in the future, free hosting", but I'm not sure what that means.)
Yeah, you provide it yourself.
Re:Urbit OS 1
by robenkleene on Thursday April 30, 2020 @04:24PM
(#23035648)
Cool thanks, in what sense is it distributed then?
Everybody having their own VPS is far more distributed than Facebook/Twitter/Slack but it's less distributed than some of the social blockchain systems. They have some good commentary on this point: https://urbit.org/blog/common-objections-to-urbit/#gov
Re:Urbit OS 1
by robenkleene on Thursday April 30, 2020 @04:36PM
(#23035781)
Got it, so the social features are distributed (like Mastadon/Email are), but the OS install itself is not distributed?
(As an aside, the whole "$PROVIDER is going to hack into my VM" thing is pretty overblown. The cloud has existed for over 10 years and the worst that happens is the provider deletes all your data and you restore from backup onto a different provider. You do have a backup that isn't on the same provider, right?)