In talking to other people high up on the technical side I realized it is a norm. The only question is if what I call "velocity of awesomeness of the product" makes the warts less important.
Or in my case recently... someone has generated a root certificate for the internal CA that uses an insecure crypto scheme, and Chrome still throws up a security error requiring users to click past the warnings to access the site.
"Can you generate and roll out a new cert please? This isn't really 'security'?"
"Oh we will get to it, can you just use the one you already have?"
Cue 2 years going by. Same situation, except that the certificate has been regenerated with the same insecure crypto scheme.
Our industry needs to do better, and not brush off good security as "glossy marketing talk".
We're hoping to use SPIFFE/SPIRE to bring adoption even higher.
After that I as a consultant get access to the network and apart from some test that a developer stood up nothing matches the glossy talk.
Thanks god for Wireguard. It has truly been the savior deploying encrypted networks.