Exactly. If one draws the distinction that children aren't allowed in bars, alcohol stores or adult bookstores, why can't persons who are vulnerable not be allowed where people assembling might cause them vulnerable harm?

This would allow people their freedom to assemble.

While I appreciate the attempt to find a compromise, this example is totally inappropriate for an infectious disease in a population.

Well then, consider the bubble boy who was immunodeficient. All those vulnerable to the degree it is life threatening can get one of those and let everyone else get on with their lives.