News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:0.999...= 1 by mjd on Tuesday April 28, 2020 @06:50PM (#23013063)
That is not what I meant at all. (My phrasing was unclear. Sorry for the confusion.) Jordi understood what I meant though.
Re:0.999...= 1 by barrkel on Friday May 01, 2020 @08:13PM (#23047809)
It was unclear; I understand rational numbers to be ratios, and irrationals to be inexpressible as fractions, and I see an almost direct connection between that and digital representation in rational bases, so it seemed deeply confusing to see a consequence of the definition of rationals being refuted. The only way out was an irrational base.