Re:0.999...= 1
by mjd on Tuesday April 28, 2020 @06:50PM
(#23013063)
That is not what I meant at all. (My phrasing was unclear. Sorry for the confusion.) Jordi understood what I meant though.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
It was unclear; I understand rational numbers to be ratios, and irrationals to be inexpressible as fractions, and I see an almost direct connection between that and digital representation in rational bases, so it seemed deeply confusing to see a consequence of the definition of rationals being refuted. The only way out was an irrational base.