> Let’s not forget that time zones are a human invention less than 200 years old.

What's the point of that statement? Before the introduction of formal time zones, we had thousands of informal ones, one for each settlement, calibrating noon to the zenith of the sun.

The point is to indicate that humans knew how to wake up, eat food, communicate, and conduct business (even over long distances) before they had clocks much less the relatively recently invented time zones.

200 years ago we didn't need timezones because we couldn't communicate or travel fast enough or often enough for them to matter. With railroads and telegraphs the level of granularity required for "some time 300 miles away" went from days to hours and minutes. No one in the U.S. west wanted to be told "The sun is at its zenith around 8 a.m. for you." For most people talking about time in their day to day lives it's far more useful to communicate a relative time of day with people near them than to communicate an absolute moment in time and do the math to figure out how bright it is outside.

> 200 years ago we didn't need timezones because...

We still do not. China and India are examples of large geographies spanning across a vast amount of longitude and yet each are a single time zone. Time zones are a political entity only, an unnecessary complexity. The absence of time zones will not halt business or communication over long distances.

> For most people talking about time in their day to day lives it's far more useful to communicate a relative time of day

People have done this for thousands of years without modern chronometers. Examples: dusk, dawn, morning, midday, afternoon, evening, twilight.

These two national policies aren't equally difficult: India extends across about 29° of longitude, while China extends across about 61°. The natural size of a time zone is 15° of longitude, so without political considerations India would include about 2-3 time zones, while China would include about 4-5.

I've heard there's some pushback against the Chinese policy in that some people in the west keep an unofficial local time which is widely understood and quoted (though presumably not for things that are sufficiently official or relevant to other regions). Apparently there's currently an ethnic conflict over the time zone status in Xinjiang:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_Time

Maybe this conflict has now been pushed underground by force?

> In 2018, according to Human Rights Watch, a Uyghur man was arrested and sent to a detention center because he set his watch to Xinjiang Time.