YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly contradicts WHO advice

Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co... by pjc50 on Friday April 24, 2020 @12:13PM (#22969647)

[citation needed]

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co... by Alex3917 on Friday April 24, 2020 @12:17PM (#22969710)

http://www.oxygenhealingtherapies.com/my_ozone_doctor.com.ht...

https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789048192335

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co... by pjc50 on Friday April 24, 2020 @01:24PM (#22970644)

[non-garbage citations needed]

(the first talks about ozone, which is a disinfectant but fundamentally cannot be taken internally as it's a gas, and it's slightly toxic https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/ozone-generators-... ; the book mentions "Oxygen-Ozone therapy is a complementary approach less known than homeopathy and acupuncture" so that's obviously quackery as well)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co... by Alex3917 on Friday April 24, 2020 @01:33PM (#22970756)

Do you not see how it's ironic that you're calling other people quacks, in the context of literally lobbying against using empirical evidence to decide whether or not something is safe and effective?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co... by aww_dang on Friday April 24, 2020 @11:43PM (#22975357)

You're engaging with someone who has endeavored to derail a discussion into partisan interpretations of Trump's statements. This after sidestepping logic in the original thread, bodes poorly for any further responses.

[ Parent | on HN ]