News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Preliminary test results suggest 21% of NYC residents hav... by Mikeb85 on Friday April 24, 2020 @03:14AM (#22965451)
I literally made the same comment a few days ago but here goes: every thread about a study such as this one is has criticisms concerning the scientific accuracy even though all these studies point to the same conclusion and not one of them provide evidence to the contrary.

This isn't exact science, we're in the middle of a pandemic. But all these antibody studies are pointing towards the same conclusion.

Re:Preliminary test results suggest 21% of NYC residents hav... by smacktoward on Friday April 24, 2020 @03:29AM (#22965541)
Do they all use the same testing mechanism? If they do, a flaw in that mechanism could result in them all being incorrect or misleading in the same way(s).
Re:Preliminary test results suggest 21% of NYC residents hav... by DeonPenny on Friday April 24, 2020 @03:32AM (#22965555)
I can't believe people are still screaming false results at this point every single random sampling has been the same or point to more infections. At this point based on everyone's method of random sampling that should merit the badge of random sampling, but people argue it on every post.
Re:Preliminary test results suggest 21% of NYC residents hav... by chasd00 on Friday April 24, 2020 @09:01AM (#22967469)
I agree. I'm not a conspiracy nut but it's getting hard to ignore the feeling ulterior motives are at work here.