Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co...
by ketzu on Thursday April 23, 2020 @07:00PM
(#22962585)
"Only" qualifies "need". "you only need to wear a seat belt on public roads" and "you should wear a seat belt on private roads" are not contradictions.
Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co...
by yellowapple on Friday April 24, 2020 @04:48AM
(#22965937)
You're confusing a declarative v. an imperative statement. What you propose is a declarative, and you're correct that it ain't contradictory.
The WHO's messaging, however, is imperative¹ (emphasis theirs):
"For healthy people wear a mask only if you are taking care of a person with suspected 2019-nCov infection"
This makes it clear that it directly contradicts the more widely-accepted similarly-imperative advice of "wear a mask in public, no matter what".
----
¹: https://www.who.int/images/default-source/health-topics/coro...
Re:YouTube bans coronavirus-related content that directly co...
by happytoexplain on Thursday April 23, 2020 @08:26PM
(#22963276)
In English, "you only need to" is completely different from "you need to only".
Sure it is. Only means exclusively, one, no more. They're saying, "You exclusively need to wear a mask if you're taking care of a person with C-19". This action, excluding all others.