News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A theory of Zoom fatigue by londons_explore on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @08:45AM (#22934429)
You should note that most landlines have significantly more delay than they used to have 50 years ago.

All landlines now get digitised and packetized, and usually go over an IP network, frequently via the landline companies HQ hundreds of miles away, before heading back to your neighbours house who you were calling...

Data is the same - If I ping my next door neighbor, from my broadband connection to his, it goes via London (my ISP's headquarters) and Manchester (his ISP's headquarters) before coming back to him, with a round trip latency of >20ms. In sound terms, that delay is like him standing in the next room over.

Re:A theory of Zoom fatigue by Wowfunhappy on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @09:19AM (#22934680)
> Data is the same - If I ping my next door neighbor, from my broadband connection to his, it goes via London (my ISP's headquarters) and Manchester (his ISP's headquarters) before coming back to him, with a round trip latency of >20ms. In sound terms, that delay is like him standing in the next room over.

I feel like that would be enough to be basically perfect, though. If only we could cut down on everything else in the chain adding its own latency.

Re:A theory of Zoom fatigue by mhh__ on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @11:46AM (#22935989)
I think the rule of thumb I used to go by when recording myself playing guitar was that 20ms was a noticeable delay, 100ms was sort of tolerable and anything more than that was enough to make my picking lose synchronization.
Re:A theory of Zoom fatigue by MisterTea on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @12:20PM (#22936357)
I remember hearing 16 ms being the general threshold for most people recognizing out of synch audio.
Re:A theory of Zoom fatigue by Klinky on Saturday April 25, 2020 @12:40PM (#22979293)
16ms is also approximately 60 frames/samples second (hz).