News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by tomcam on Monday April 20, 2020 @07:30PM (#22930079)
> very-dubiously-named Local Government Information Services

Not trying to be arch here: Federal Express is an equally hinky name, isn't it? I've always thought it was confusingly, well, federal-sounding.

Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by bzusb on Monday April 20, 2020 @07:35PM (#22930119)
I'm not American and because of the name I've always assumed federal express was government-related.
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by cpeterso on Monday April 20, 2020 @07:41PM (#22930188)
And don't confuse UPS (United Parcel Service) and USPS (United States Postal Service).
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by ptha on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @04:27AM (#22933077)
Then there's the band "The Postal Service" that got a cease and desist from USPS to stop using their trademark.

However it had a happy ending: the United States Postal Service -- the real one, as in stamps and letters -- signed an agreement with Sub Pop granting a free license to use the name in exchange for working to promote using the mail. Future copies of the album and the group's follow-up work will have a notice about the trademark, while the federal Postal Service will sell the band's CD's on its Web site, potentially earning a profit. The band may do some television commercials for the post office.

[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/06/arts/music/postal-service...

Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by baby on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @12:16AM (#22931811)
For the longest time I thought these were the same companies
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by sfj on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @02:43AM (#22932598)
Or Uninteruptable Power Supply. When I got my first job, I always wondered why our company designated the UPS with their own room on the floor map...
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by dreamcompiler on Monday April 20, 2020 @09:22PM (#22930871)
This is fascinating; I had no idea that non-Americans thought this. Every American knows it's a private company and most know it's a classic rags-to-riches story started by a guy named Fred. It simply never occurred to me that anyone might assume it was a government entity, even though now I get why.
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by perl4ever on Monday April 20, 2020 @09:38PM (#22930974)
Oh, come on. It's plausible that most Americans know it's a private company, but most people do not know it was started by a guy named Fred. (or do you mean a guy named Fed?)
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by edoceo on Monday April 20, 2020 @11:07PM (#22931435)
Frederal Express don't have the same ring to it.
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by tomcam on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @03:04AM (#22932685)
I don’t know, Busby, I think you’re onto something ;
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by dreamcompiler on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @12:13AM (#22931794)
Maybe I should have said "Americans my age." Fred Smith got a lot of news coverage in the 80s. He used to be a case study in business schools.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_W._Smith

Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by dreamcompiler on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @12:16AM (#22931810)
...and apparently I was wrong about the rags part.
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by kristjansson on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @12:37AM (#22931936)
He did get close to rags in the middle there
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by rsynnott on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @09:49AM (#22934938)
Well, then, clearly it should be called Frederal Expresss.
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by farazbabar on Monday April 20, 2020 @09:41PM (#22930999)
A long time ago when I lived in Pakistan, the local franchise holder for Federal Express processed and handled visa applications to United States. The final interview if needed was still conducted by Consulate employees but everything else was Federal Express. I want to be clear that nobody wa strying to imply that Fedex was a government agency but it acted almost like USPS does for US passports.
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by xyzzyz on Monday April 20, 2020 @09:49PM (#22931052)
USPS has a contract with Fedex to carry its mail, by the way, so the US passports are also most likely handled by Fedex at some point.
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by perl4ever on Monday April 20, 2020 @09:36PM (#22930966)
Government Employees Insurance Company
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by coolgeek on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @01:15PM (#22947864)
Their products were originally only offered to/available to government employees. The name was purely - and accurately - descriptive. There was no intention to deceive, in this case.
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by collinmanderson on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @08:31AM (#22934328)
Yup, GEICO.
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by empath75 on Monday April 20, 2020 @07:43PM (#22930209)
It hasn’t been called federal express for decades.
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by nkozyra on Monday April 20, 2020 @09:11PM (#22930805)
Sort of a difference without distinction given it still has the Fed part, which is a pretty common shorthand for things that are, well, federal.
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by NotSammyHagar on Tuesday April 21, 2020 @01:22AM (#22932227)
yeah, now we call it fedex, very clear what that means ;-)
Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by casefields on Monday April 20, 2020 @07:37PM (#22930141)
Same goes for the Federal Reserve, which is why there's so many conspiracy theories around it:

>The stockholders in the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks are the privately owned banks that fall under the Federal Reserve System. These include all national banks (chartered by the federal government) and those state-chartered banks that wish to join and meet certain requirements. About 38 percent of the nation’s more than 8,000 banks are members of the system, and thus own the Fed banks.

https://www.factcheck.org/2008/03/federal-reserve-bank-owner...

Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by zrail on Monday April 20, 2020 @07:49PM (#22930250)
The Federal Reserve is not misleadingly named. It was created by an act of the US Congress. The board is appointed by the President and the Congress sets their salaries. It’s completely appropriate for it to bear the word “Federal” in it’s name.

The conspiracy theories are because people make up stories to fill in what they don’t understand.

Re:Who’s behind the “reopen” domain surge? by mandelbrotwurst on Monday April 20, 2020 @07:55PM (#22930297)
The FRB is often described as "private", but it really isn't, certainly not in the way that FedEx is. It:

1. Has the website https://www.federalreserve.gov/ 2. Seems to be considered a federal agency, given that it is subject to FOIA request 3. Was created by the federal government 4. Is run by a Presidentially appointed chairman

...etc....etc...