News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Errorship, use datadog as an error tracker by EdwardDiego on Sunday April 19, 2020 @08:43AM (#22915527)
> errorship is not using the datadog eventstream to send all logs to it.

Yep, noted that, and I like how you preserve syntax highlighting in the stack traces :)

Out of curiosity, I've only ever dabbled in Datadog, is there any limit on event stream size or retention? I couldn't find anything mentioned in the docs.

Re:Show HN: Errorship, use datadog as an error tracker by RabbitmqGuy on Sunday April 19, 2020 @08:58AM (#22915595)
I had also noticed the lack of mention in the docs, so I reached out to datadog sometime last year. Their response was that it doesn't have any limits or quota
Re:Show HN: Errorship, use datadog as an error tracker by tyingq on Sunday April 19, 2020 @09:45AM (#22915840)
Interesting. Is there some disincentive that discourages it? Is it hard (or costly) to query, for example...compared to paying specifically for logging?

Seems like a big loophole.