Nice use of quotation marks there, considering that is not what I said.
which part didn't you say exactly?
> "First they make a completely reasonable and temporary restriction of right of physical assembly, next we'll be off to the gulags."
Please find this text in my post.
>have, can, and will always find some new "threat" with which to justify taking away civil liberties.
So slippery slope, is what you're arguing? "First they make a completely reasonable and temporary restriction of right of physical assembly, next we'll be off to the gulags." Isn't really an interesting argument, is it?