Re:“May I suggest that Mr. Bond be armed with a revolver?” (...
by touktouk on Sunday April 19, 2020 @07:53AM
(#22915238)
Would that mean that any assassination done with a weapon is a failure?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“May I suggest that Mr. Bond be armed with a revolver?” (...
by TeMPOraL on Sunday April 19, 2020 @08:13AM
(#22915347)
I would think the primary job of a spy is to be a manager (a handler) of a bunch of traitors (including unwitting ones) in the enemy country. Any eventual assassinations would be best done through the hands of one of those subordinates.
Re:“May I suggest that Mr. Bond be armed with a revolver?” (...
by sideshowb on Sunday April 19, 2020 @06:32PM
(#22919349)
This is more like the picture le carre paints
Re:“May I suggest that Mr. Bond be armed with a revolver?” (...
by brazzy on Sunday April 19, 2020 @08:07AM
(#22915315)
No, it would mean that spies don't do assassinations.
The primary job of a spy is to gather classified information, ideally without anyone noticing. Dead bodies tend to be noticed.
Re:“May I suggest that Mr. Bond be armed with a revolver?” (...
by sizzzzlerz on Sunday April 19, 2020 @09:02AM
(#22915621)
Actually, in all the Bond movies, I don't recall him ever having a mission to spy per your definition. Spies are typically used in situations between countries and many of Bonds foes clearly weren't countries, e.g., Goldfinger, Dr. No, Drax. They were just super criminals without allegiance to any country. The closest classic spy movie I recall was From Russia With Love but even that involved SPECTRE more than Russian.
Re:“May I suggest that Mr. Bond be armed with a revolver?” (...
by ocdtrekkie on Sunday April 19, 2020 @10:00AM
(#22915949)
I mean, fundamentally the spy thriller spy does anything a given country needs done in another country that would otherwise be considered illegal or an act of war, if the provenance of the order was known.