Re:Amazon employees plan ‘online walkout’ to protest treatme...
by benbenolson on Friday April 17, 2020 @01:27PM
(#22901040)
Email servers, electricity, the time spent setting it all up, the server room that stores the machines, the IT department that maintains the machines and keeps things running, the client hardware that the employee interacts with...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon employees plan ‘online walkout’ to protest treatme...
by kennywinker on Friday April 17, 2020 @01:52PM
(#22901265)
You're explicitly allowed to put up signs in the break room, and the cost of the break room existing is DEFINITELY non-zero. Explain to me how those things are different? Email is the workplace.
Re:Amazon employees plan ‘online walkout’ to protest treatme...
by tantalor on Friday April 17, 2020 @01:43PM
(#22901182)
The marginal cost of everything you mentioned is zero per email.
Re:Amazon employees plan ‘online walkout’ to protest treatme...
by michaelsitver on Friday April 17, 2020 @01:53PM
(#22901274)
Essentialy zero isn't Zero at Amazon scale (or the scale of any large business)
Re:Amazon employees plan ‘online walkout’ to protest treatme...
by kennywinker on Friday April 17, 2020 @02:12PM
(#22901414)
Does an email server processing n emails per second require more power to process n+1 emails per second? My suspicion is that unless that +1 hits some capacity limit, the number of emails we're talking about required to organize union activities would be undetectable.
That said, even if it is detectible, I think that employees should be allowed to drain some small amount of a company's resources to organize. I am allowed to use company resources for emails like "who wants to go for beers after work?" why should I not be allowed to send "who wants to go organize collective action after work?"