Re:Unintended Consequences, Part I: What if Chrysler was not...
by andysandwich on Thursday April 16, 2020 @04:26PM
(#22893168)
Article talks about how a Chrysler bankruptcy would have made remaining automakers more competitive, particularly vs Japanese brands.
It should also mention that public would have had more money to spend on other things because 1) cheaper cars, and 2) they would have kept the money that was spent on the bailout. That could also have created jobs that the UAW was afraid of losing.
The increased productivity could then have been spent on transitioning the Chrysler workers.
Re:Unintended Consequences, Part I: What if Chrysler was not...
by frankharv on Thursday April 16, 2020 @04:18PM
(#22893078)
I would argue that Chrysler did not invent the SUV.
Kaiser Jeep 1963 Wagoneer and 1966 Jeepster Commando were popular SUV's and the 1979 AMC Eagle was the first crossover SUV.
Otherwise I really like the premise of too big to fail and how it has affected the US.
It should also mention that public would have had more money to spend on other things because 1) cheaper cars, and 2) they would have kept the money that was spent on the bailout. That could also have created jobs that the UAW was afraid of losing.
The increased productivity could then have been spent on transitioning the Chrysler workers.