News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla, Musk must face shareholder lawsuit over going-priv... by nickff on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @06:34PM (#22883923)
I'm not taking a position on whether it's 'just', I am simply pointing out that it primarily benefits the lawyers, and may benefit a few former shareholders.

I believe that class-action suits are supposed to benefit the class, both in the judgement/settlement and in changing long-term incentives. Shareholder lawsuits appear to do neither.

Re:Tesla, Musk must face shareholder lawsuit over going-priv... by projektfu on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @06:43PM (#22884014)
Fair enough but screwing speculators in favor of die hard fans is not enough reason to hold off.
Re:Tesla, Musk must face shareholder lawsuit over going-priv... by nickff on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @06:47PM (#22884053)
If this were a class-action lawsuit by people who were shorting Tesla stock, or owned some option on it, I would agree that it would be serve the purposes of class-action lawsuits (aside from lawyer-enrichment). But it isn't.
Re:Tesla, Musk must face shareholder lawsuit over going-priv... by projektfu on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @06:57PM (#22884143)
Unfortunately for your position, it’s considered to harm all investors when a key executive mouths off like this.
Re:Tesla, Musk must face shareholder lawsuit over going-priv... by nickff on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @07:01PM (#22884168)
I definitely agree that key executives mouthing off does harm the shareholders; the problem is that these shareholder class-actions against companies do not provide a real remedy to the harmed shareholders.

I also agree that courts are allowing these lawsuits to proceed despite hearing objections like mine.