Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim...
by frockington1 on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @07:49AM
(#22876651)
I remember people screaming that it would be worse than 9/11 and Pearl Harbor two weeks ago. Still waiting on anything that level of sheer panic and pandemonium. Sadly I don't think anyone is going to be willing to admit they were wrong anytime soon.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim...
by lovehashbrowns on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @10:26AM
(#22878069)
25,832 deaths in the US from COVID-19 isn't really all that bad, huh?
Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim...
by frockington1 on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @10:32AM
(#22878144)
In a population of 325 million, not really. I remember back in March when the media was saying at least 6 million people would die and that bodies would be piling up in the streets. Currently seems like the biggest threat will be unemployment and continued economic downturn
Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim...
by lovehashbrowns on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @10:54AM
(#22878413)
Ah, you're one of those people that looks at 25,000 dead in ~41 days AFTER shelter-in-place provisions and thinks it's not a big deal. Gotcha.
Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim...
by Lewton on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @10:53AM
(#22878401)
You do realize there are countries who didn't act in time where the bodies literally are piling up in the streets right?
Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim...
by Ensorceled on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @12:21PM
(#22879605)
News flash, it is worse than 9/11, more dead in NYC AND a larger economic impact (well other than COVID hasn't yet started two wars)