News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim... by CydeWeys on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @09:12PM (#22873405)
Give it time. They're still in full exponential growth, whereas every place that enacted social distancing rules a couple weeks ago or more is now plateauing.
Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim... by fullshark on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @09:44PM (#22873615)
Possibly, their numbers the last 4 days are bizarre, potentially due to holiday effects.

My guess is what's going to happen is they will see more deaths, but not an unreasonable number and both sides of the debate will declare victory as they move the goal posts sufficiently.

Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim... by CydeWeys on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @11:20PM (#22874148)
My guess is that they'll end up having to do more stringent social distancing measures anyway, but that a lot of people will end up having unnecessarily died because they waited so long relative to other countries. Because currently they are on track for an unreasonable number of deaths, and it would reasonable to change the course of action so that that doesn't happen.

I'm not seeing a lot of subtlety in these outcomes, nor possibility of both sides (credibly) claiming that they were right. We'll know soon enough either way.

Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim... by williamstein on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @09:59PM (#22873688)
Sweden's number of confirmed cases is not in full exponential growth right now. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/sweden/
Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim... by CydeWeys on Tuesday April 14, 2020 @10:02PM (#22873699)
They've fallen behind in testing capacity, like many others. You have to go by hospitalizations and confirmed deaths because those are the only stats likely not to be underreported too badly.
Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim... by magsnus on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @12:15PM (#22879529)
Exactly, look at the logarithmic curve of deaths and you see a clear flattening so no "exponential growth" as you where saying.
Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim... by Lewton on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @01:02PM (#22880161)
15% of deaths happened in the past 24 hours, that's not a flattening of the curve

Maybe you're being fooled by the lack of reported deaths in the weekends in Sweden? It does mess up the curve quite a bit. But it's been like that every weekend if you look at daily deaths. And it makes the log graph look less exponential than it is

Also the log graph is a day behind the reported numbers, so tomorrow you'll see a sharp rise as they're at 1200 deaths now, making it clear that it's indeed exponential

Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim... by magsnus on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @01:22PM (#22880451)
So last tuesday they reported 114 deaths yesterday they reported 114 deaths. You can't be seriously looking at the bar graph of daily deaths and see an exponential growth. If anything it seems to have stagnated. Yes we underreport during the weekend and overreport the first days after the weekend and monday was a holiday for us. But it is clear as day if you look at the logarithmic chart over deaths that our growth is slowing.
Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim... by Lewton on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @01:58PM (#22880877)
Similar cherry-picking leads to: Last wednesday 96 deaths happened, which was around 15% of total deaths at the time. And this wednesday 170 is reported, which is around 15% of total deaths now. That's exponential growth

You are right though, given the numbers there's decent likelihood that it's stagnating. But there's also a decent risk that it's still exponential

Re:L.A. Times to Furlough Workers as Ad Revenue ‘Nearly Elim... by magsnus on Wednesday April 15, 2020 @02:21PM (#22881156)
Again, 3 day weekend...