Gitlab states it wants to go public this year

https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/being-a-public-company/

Even before, but moreso after this and the current economic climate, Gitlab is not going public.

Even GitHub was never in a position to go public, that seems to be mere postering to drive valuation or attract M&A offers.

That doesn't preclude AWS (or anyone else) from trying to buy them. :)

I don't know how much control their external board members have, but if an offer came in, the board may be able to force acceptance instead of going public.

While Amazon tried to go into the private hosting and ci/cd market, they are not a dev tool company. Microsoft was born as one. When Amazon or Google would buy GitLab they would meaningless integrate it, reduce staff by half and then ruin it over time.

Maybe when Microsoft would have opened up some years earlier, Codeplex would not share the fate of Google Cloud.

> While Amazon tried to go into the private hosting and ci/cd market, they are not a dev tool company

When did Amazon give up?

Oh sorry, I guess they did not. But their offerings are not really compelling outside AWS deployment.

It breaks the site guidelines to post accusations of astroturfing like this. The overwhelming majority of the time, there isn't the slightest evidence for these. Somebody liking something that you dislike does not count as evidence.

I've studied the question closely on HN and looked at data for years. There have been occasional cases where we've banned accounts for the kind of thing you're complaining about, but we have to go by evidence. Well over 99.9% of the time, users are just making shit up. Please don't trash talk like that here.

If you want more explanation, see https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme....

Please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules from now on. If you're genuinely worried about astroturfing, you're welcome to email links to [email protected] and we'll look into it.

Hi Dan, my apologies for that. I wasn't trying to specifically single out that account. I've seen a strong push for MS products since VS Code, and it is impossible to be an accident. My post was made out of curiosity as opposed to malice. It was not intended as a passive-aggressive accusation, but I understand the rule there. I appreciate the guidance.

Appreciated!

I'd be super careful about thoughts like this:

> and it is impossible to be an accident

Internet users are overwhelmingly, like a million times too likely to generate sinister explanations for phenomena like this, which are typically just artifacts of a large population size plus randomness. There's something in how human nature meets the internet which makes us vulnerable to this bias. Probably it's just that we're not wired to interact with very large populations of people. Cognitive bias plus randomness equals narrative.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

I think there might be a mixup about how it might appear that I'm talking about astroturfing. I'm referencing a situation where one or more marketing teams have leveraged their large employee and contractor network to engage positively with Microsoft's listed products and services on HN. More of a mobilize from within as opposed to a secret or stealthy program to create false accounts.

Quick edit: I definitely appreciate the "red car effect" you are referencing.

Are you trying to imply the person above is a microsoft marketing person or something?

FYI, I am not a member of Microsoft. Just a fanboy. Do not know what is worse ;)

But I agree with the statement. The presence of Product Managers, Senior Devs and high ranking managers here on HN is pretty well orchestrated. I mean makes sense.

God, I hope not. I like GitLab. I feel like Amazon would ruin it.