News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on California Supreme Court: Transaction is not required to sue online providers. Parent comment

Re:California Supreme Court: Transaction is not required to ... by wongarsu on Sunday April 12, 2020 @08:11PM (#22852006)
You can always start with "more than 50% of shares held by $ETHNICITY", and if you notice that you have an effect you can slowly lower the limit to allow fewer and fewer $ETHNICITY shareholders.
[ Parent | on HN ]
[dead]
Re:California Supreme Court: Transaction is not required to ... by Retric on Sunday April 12, 2020 @08:30PM (#22852084)
If we’re talking globally then plenty of examples of that exist right now.

I don’t know your gender, race, ethnicity, religion, or country of origin, but I can guarantee someone you’re going to have issues doing business because of discrimination. Saying X in not an issue in a country where X is protected/prohibited/regulated etc is a very week argument for getting rid of the associated laws.

[ Parent | on HN ]