Re:Why a coronavirus vaccine could take way longer than a year
by rv-de on Saturday April 11, 2020 @06:04AM
(#22840808)
immunization is not something your body obtains forever - might only be a few months. If the spread is too slow we'll never reach immunization. Instead the virus will take its rounds repeatedly infecting people.
Also the 60/70% figure assumes an R0 of about 3. It seems though that it is >5. Then you would need a herd immunization of >80%.
Re:Why a coronavirus vaccine could take way longer than a year
by pasttense01 on Saturday April 11, 2020 @02:33AM
(#22840013)
Well at 60%-70% infected you also reach the million dead figure.
Re:Why a coronavirus vaccine could take way longer than a year
by ornornor on Saturday April 11, 2020 @06:02AM
(#22840799)
Ok, but gradually. If everyone gets it at the same time, people who would have normally made it would die because contention over the medical resources.
Re:Why a coronavirus vaccine could take way longer than a year
by kleton on Saturday April 11, 2020 @02:39AM
(#22840036)
马牛羊 鸡犬豕
此六畜 人所饲
Horse, ox, sheep, fowl, dog, pig
These six animals are those which men keep
Re:Why a coronavirus vaccine could take way longer than a year
by loftyal on Saturday April 11, 2020 @03:30AM
(#22840206)
Isolation of the elderly and at-risk groups until either vaccine or herd immunity whilst increasing the stockpiles of PPE and ventilators seem like the only real strategy at the moment.
Re:Why a coronavirus vaccine could take way longer than a year
by guscost on Saturday April 11, 2020 @01:43AM
(#22839839)
Yes, to be fair that seems to be the likely plan. It’s only crackpots like Bill Gates who are suggesting we go for the vaccine instead. Which, in his defense, might make sense to keep working on as a hedge.
I wonder if China will strictly prohibit the hunting and eating of wild animals as a result from this outbreak and the considerable international pressure, or if it’ll keep going.