Re:Candidate to Lead the W.H.O. Accused of Covering Up Epide...
by nradov on Thursday April 09, 2020 @10:12PM
(#22829291)
It seems unlikely that the current Supreme Court would countenance such a blatant violation of the 1st and 4th Amendments regardless of the potential public health benefits. If you're going to propose an alternative then it needs to be something that could actually be implemented in the real world.
More widespread voluntary testing is certainly needed but it's going to take a while to scale up capacity.
Re:Candidate to Lead the W.H.O. Accused of Covering Up Epide...
by ceejayoz on Thursday April 09, 2020 @11:29PM
(#22829746)
The Supreme Court has a long history of upholding things like quarantines and curfews during public health emergencies.
Re:Candidate to Lead the W.H.O. Accused of Covering Up Epide...
by nradov on Friday April 10, 2020 @08:33AM
(#22832376)
Read the precedents. There's no question that infectious disease carriers can be forcibly quarantined. But forcing apparently healthy people to undergo an invasive medical procedure (a search) in order to exercise their right to assemble would be another thing altogether. And long-term curfews for adults have never been upheld.
False dichotomy. There are far better things we could try.
One proposal I've seen batted around is widespread, rapid testing. Checkpoints on the interstates and elsewhere where you get one of the 15 minute rapid tests and get a day pass to continue on your way.
We know we can get R0 down with distancing; NYC's falling new hospitalizations numbers are a clear sign of that. Testing allows us to relax restrictions without it flaring up so fast, and lets us find the flare.
Add in universal, required mask wearing. None of the wishy-washy "we recommend..." bullshit.