Re:Signal threatens to dump US market if EARN IT act passes
by coldpie on Thursday April 09, 2020 @04:16PM
(#22826736)
> why is she always on the worst side when it comes to privacy
Because she is a terrible Senator. Please, please, please stop voting for her already.
Re:Signal threatens to dump US market if EARN IT act passes
by catalogia on Thursday April 09, 2020 @04:54PM
(#22827070)
She's 86 now and the next time she'll be up for reelection is in 2024. There's a good chance she won't be around long enough to ever lose reelection.
Re:Signal threatens to dump US market if EARN IT act passes
by smegger001 on Thursday April 09, 2020 @07:00PM
(#22828093)
on the other hand the late Senator Strom Thormond didn't leave office until he retired at age 100.
Re:Signal threatens to dump US market if EARN IT act passes
by nocman on Friday April 10, 2020 @04:59PM
(#22837306)
I know this is a day old now, but Pelosi was born March 26, 1940, so she is 80 (not 86).
Re:Signal threatens to dump US market if EARN IT act passes
by yesco on Friday April 10, 2020 @06:32PM
(#22838000)
This discussion is about Dianne Feinstein, not Pelosi.
Re:Signal threatens to dump US market if EARN IT act passes
by nocman on Friday April 10, 2020 @08:31PM
(#22838755)
LOL. Sorry about that. Not sure where I got my wires crossed there. Must have gotten distracted somewhere in the middle while looking it up. I also didn't realize that Feinstein was that old.
Re:Signal threatens to dump US market if EARN IT act passes
by yjftsjthsd-h on Thursday April 09, 2020 @05:46PM
(#22827542)
> There's a good chance she won't be around long enough to ever lose reelection.
No need to be so negative. Isn't it nicer to say, "There's a good chance that she won't win reelection*."?
Re:Signal threatens to dump US market if EARN IT act passes
by catalogia on Thursday April 09, 2020 @07:37PM
(#22828386)
I think that phrasing is more ambiguous, not nicer (nor meaner.) "Won't win reelection" is phrasing that's compatible with a 'loses the election' scenario, which I consider implausible (If she's still alive in 2024, she'll undoubtedly win.) Adding ambiguity to my comment doesn't make it nicer; it only increases the chance that I might be misunderstood.
Re:Signal threatens to dump US market if EARN IT act passes
by api on Thursday April 09, 2020 @09:14PM
(#22828942)
She's a Democrat from the district including SF. She could eat a baby on live TV and still win. It's like being a Republican from a heavily rural Texas or Utah district. Congressmen and senators from hard single party regions are basically tenured.
Re:Signal threatens to dump US market if EARN IT act passes
by hedora on Thursday April 09, 2020 @10:03PM
(#22829236)
She’s basically a moderate republican:
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/congress-trump-score/
She used to vote with Trump more than any other Democrat. Now she’s number 2 (and she is much further right wing than many republican senators).
I don’t understand how she keeps winning in places like SF. Even a California republican would probably be further to the left than she is.
Re:Signal threatens to dump US market if EARN IT act passes
by SamReidHughes on Friday April 10, 2020 @06:38AM
(#22831668)
You aren't sorting by the proper column. She's right in the middle of the Democrats.
I've written her enough that I can already write my own reply from her office. Shorter Feinstein: "Thank you for your concerns, but you're wrong."