News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Signal threatens to dump US market if EARN IT act passes by yjftsjthsd-h on Thursday April 09, 2020 @05:46PM (#22827542)
> There's a good chance she won't be around long enough to ever lose reelection.

No need to be so negative. Isn't it nicer to say, "There's a good chance that she won't win reelection*."?

Re:Signal threatens to dump US market if EARN IT act passes by catalogia on Thursday April 09, 2020 @07:37PM (#22828386)
I think that phrasing is more ambiguous, not nicer (nor meaner.) "Won't win reelection" is phrasing that's compatible with a 'loses the election' scenario, which I consider implausible (If she's still alive in 2024, she'll undoubtedly win.) Adding ambiguity to my comment doesn't make it nicer; it only increases the chance that I might be misunderstood.