Re:Swift: Google’s Bet on Differentiable Programming
by chowells on Thursday April 09, 2020 @11:35AM
(#22823547)
"differential" and "differentiable" are different words. Both are being used correctly. Is the problem only that the two words look kind of similar? That seems like an impractical requirement.
Re:Swift: Google’s Bet on Differentiable Programming
by TACIXAT on Thursday April 09, 2020 @11:17AM
(#22823349)
Yea, cryptocurrencies will never be known as crypto. The term was coined long ago as a short hand for cryptography.
Re:Swift: Google’s Bet on Differentiable Programming
by strbean on Thursday April 09, 2020 @05:16PM
(#22827296)
God I hate the trend of using a prefix on its own as a stand in for '<prefix><thing>'. I think it's a symptom of politicians trying to sound stupid to avoid sounding elitist.
What do you think will have more impact on the economy, crypto or cyber?
Re:Swift: Google’s Bet on Differentiable Programming
by jacoblambda on Thursday April 09, 2020 @07:45PM
(#22828442)
I think using the shorten version is perfectly valid only provided the context is correct.
If you are talking to someone about cryptocurrency, referring to it as crypto later in the conversation in context is perfectly valid and doesn't lessen the meaning.
I do however agree with you when outside of it's context that these shortened names are horrible and effectively buzzwords.
Differential programming would be less flashy but may be confusing.
I wouldn’t actually be interested in this topic much except for the top level comment complaining about them wanting a new version control system for this and now I’m a bit curious what they’re on about this time, so will probably get sucked in.