News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Qt and Open Source by dman on Thursday April 09, 2020 @07:55AM (#22821661)
I have written a fair amount of software in Qt. It has been clear to me from the actions of the Qt company (via the amount they charge for it, getting rid of indie plans which allowed you to use it Qt for ~350 bucks a year vs the $5508 a year that they have chosen the strategy of milking the captive users that Qt has rather than expanding Qt out and courting new users. For better or for worse at this point I see closed source Qt going the way of Delphi. Qts long term survival depends on a viable and vibrant OSS fork.
Re:Qt and Open Source by mgreenleaf on Thursday April 09, 2020 @06:33PM (#22827900)
I don't have a lot of experience with it, but Copperspice looks promising, and doesn't need the MOC. Does anyone else have experience with any critical differences between Qt and Copperspice?
Re:Qt and Open Source by merb on Thursday April 09, 2020 @05:36PM (#22827467)
i.e. you do not need a license to have commercial qt programs, as long as you correctly use LPGL as a license, which is really really simple. IANAL but their licensing pages and legal pages are extremly misleading.