News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Faceshield by zimpenfish on Wednesday April 08, 2020 @03:28AM (#22810779)
> Face mask + goggles fully covers the 3 places the virus can enter (mouth, nose and eyes)

I believe face masks are only 95% effective at best and that's only with a proper N95 which a lot of medical staff appear not to be able to get hold of. Hence they're wearing things like Buffs or cycling masks to make do. In that situation, having another layer that can stop droplets etc. from reaching the mask in the first place makes sense to me.

Plus it stops a whole lot of messy body fluids from reaching the mask and goggles which cuts out a swap/clean cycle (again, difficult if there's no spares!)

[Edit to correct 'googles' to 'goggles', FFHS]

Re:Apple Faceshield by varenc on Wednesday April 08, 2020 @06:39AM (#22811704)
An N95 respirator is rated to block at least 95% of 0.3 μm particles. It’ll do waaay better than 95% at blocking droplets! They’re much larger.

(though N99 and N100 respirators do exist)

Re:Apple Faceshield by stubish on Wednesday April 08, 2020 @12:09PM (#22814197)
But remember that a respirator blocks 0% of particles getting in your eyes.
Re:Apple Faceshield by ehsankia on Wednesday April 08, 2020 @02:10PM (#22815423)
I see, so are they wearing these shields on top of the usual mask?