News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jonesforth: Implementing Forth in Assembly by throwaway_pdp09 on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @12:37PM (#22804746)
I don't buy this. I understand the use of your term 'threaded', but these are unconditional and therefore can be incorporated into the instruction pipeline with little or no overhead. Here's a very old SO post, CPus won't have got worse since then

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5127833/meaningful-cost-...

"But in general, on modern processors, there is minimal cost for an unconditional jump. It's basically pretty much free apart from a very small amount of instruction cache overhead. It will probably get executed in parallel with neighbouring instructions so might not even cost you a clock cycle. "

Re:Jonesforth: Implementing Forth in Assembly by rwmj on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @01:03PM (#22805080)
If they were all unconditional, that would be fine. The problem is they are all computed jumps (see jonesforth for details).
Re:Jonesforth: Implementing Forth in Assembly by throwaway_pdp09 on Tuesday April 07, 2020 @01:15PM (#22805228)
I see what you're getting at now, thanks