Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by jayzee on Tuesday March 01, 2011 @11:49PM
(#2278504)
It is a very good question that pg asked while just joking around something that I guess all entrepreneurs should have an immediate answer to, 'Why doesn't this already exist?'
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by justin on Wednesday March 02, 2011 @01:14AM
(#2278647)
Justin.tv (neither an online streaming live show of some guy's life, nor a streaming platform for live video) didn't exist before we were funded, fyibtw.
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by prpon on Wednesday March 02, 2011 @01:20AM
(#2278656)
Justin, I totally agree that what you did with Justin.tv was novel and didn't exist before. However, how would you have answered Why doesn't it already exist?
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by justin on Wednesday March 02, 2011 @02:40AM
(#2278797)
Ah, sorry, reading comprehension fail.
Why didn't the platform exist pre-Justin.tv?
1) Bandwidth prices were much higher in 2007, and have plummeted in the past few years, making the economics more attractive.
2) There were no good, stable streaming servers commercially available. Flash streaming in FMS 2 was a joke (it would fail constantly) in 2007. Fast forward a little while and you had Red5, FMS 3, and Wowza all with video streaming to a Flash client.
3) Video advertising market grew significantly starting around 2007, providing a monetization model.
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by Johngibb on Wednesday March 02, 2011 @03:06AM
(#2278833)
Could you really have provided these answers back when you were at the interview stage of getting funding? These all seem accurate in hindsight, but the kind of things you never would have known up front...
Edit: This isn't meant to be critical; I'm just curious how you would have answered back in a 2k7 interview?
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by justin on Wednesday March 02, 2011 @02:43PM
(#2280923)
Doubtful. We didn't even have the idea of the platform when we came up with Justin.tv. Our pitch was more along the lines of "Here's something we're passionate about that is cool" -- PG believes in funding people and believed in funding us. We figured the rest out as we went along.
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by DanielN on Wednesday March 02, 2011 @12:06AM
(#2278531)
This is pretty off topic but it interested me so I thought I would share:
This video more than anything got me interested in socialcam (of which I had never heard of before), so I did a little reading and decided to sign up for updates to the product. After I signed up the page refreshed and informed me I was ranked last (4000 and something) on their list because I hadn't gotten anyone else to sign up yet. Instantly my competitive juices started flowing and I wanted to get higher up on the list.
It just struck me as a really original interesting way to encourage sign ups (presumably for eventual beta testers).
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by tomjen3 on Wednesday March 02, 2011 @12:32AM
(#2278582)
I don't know why you can't see it, but frankly they are playing you for a fool. What they do is a classic pyramid scam, albeit with signups instead of money.
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by emmett on Wednesday March 02, 2011 @12:53AM
(#2278615)
Except instead of fooling people into thinking they're going to get rich and stealing from them, it's a free game where everyone involved wins an invite!
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by jessedhillon on Wednesday March 02, 2011 @02:38AM
(#2278786)
He's not losing anything, except a few minutes' time to sign up, so how is he being made a fool? For being excited enough about their product to want to be invited to use it? There's nothing foolish in that, especially if they have an interesting product.
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by tomjen3 on Wednesday March 02, 2011 @04:01AM
(#2278911)
He is being used as a tool to do their marketing for free.
I don't know about you, but I find it extremely tacky to use friendships to sell stuff (and he is selling your time and attention to that company for an invite) even if it doesn't involve money directly.
And that causes me to lower my opinion of both him and (especially) the company. Use sleazily marketing => you are a sleazy company.
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by jessedhillon on Wednesday March 02, 2011 @06:15PM
(#2281876)
Personally, I find cold-calling people out of the blue and trying to pitch them a product when you only have minimal indications of interest from them (if any) to be the sleaziest way to sell a product.
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by DanielN on Wednesday March 02, 2011 @01:33AM
(#2278677)
I think you may be confusing viral marketing for a pyramid scheme. Given, pyramid schemes are a form of viral marketing, but exponential growth through sharing is necessary without being sufficient.
In this case it works out fine for both parties. I signed up because I was interested in beta testing and socialcam gets to choose their potential beta testers by how social they are.
For what it's worth the system may not be very effective yet. I have one referral and I've moved from #4000 to #600
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by oldstrangers on Tuesday March 01, 2011 @11:19PM
(#2278423)
This would make for some good mental preparation and visualization. Sit back and stare at PG asking you questions over and over again and perhaps it'll help reduce your nervousness come time to interview.
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by stevefarnworth on Wednesday March 02, 2011 @06:26AM
(#2279212)
I know it's a short, light-hearted video, but that's what I imagine the YC interview to be like for some reason. Probing questions, asked politely and framed in a way to see what your response is, not just ticking questions and answers off of your mental tick sheet.
I'm based in the UK and am a single-founder, but this sort of thing just makes YC look like an even more compelling experience - all for an under 2 minute, friendly video. Good job!
Re:Inside the Y Combinator office
by Johngibb on Wednesday March 02, 2011 @03:11AM
(#2278846)
Really, I'd say this is really accurate. Any further questions grew organically from answers to the questions in this video.
For us, they made a big point of knowing that our market really existed, even though no company was targeting it yet. In fact, our lack of solid evidence of the market is the main reason for our rejection (W11). However, maybe this was only such a large focus because it was our biggest weakness, and other interviews focus on other things.
Keep in mind that the interview is only 15 minutes, so there don't need to be many questions...
http://twitter.com/#!/paulg/status/29256073985
So true.
Off the top of my mind, I can think of hipmunk,1000memories etc and would like to know how the founders would answer.
It is a much more piercing question than What are users forced to do today when your product does not exist.
Why didn't the platform exist pre-Justin.tv?
1) Bandwidth prices were much higher in 2007, and have plummeted in the past few years, making the economics more attractive.
2) There were no good, stable streaming servers commercially available. Flash streaming in FMS 2 was a joke (it would fail constantly) in 2007. Fast forward a little while and you had Red5, FMS 3, and Wowza all with video streaming to a Flash client.
3) Video advertising market grew significantly starting around 2007, providing a monetization model.
Hope that explains it!
Edit: This isn't meant to be critical; I'm just curious how you would have answered back in a 2k7 interview?
This video more than anything got me interested in socialcam (of which I had never heard of before), so I did a little reading and decided to sign up for updates to the product. After I signed up the page refreshed and informed me I was ranked last (4000 and something) on their list because I hadn't gotten anyone else to sign up yet. Instantly my competitive juices started flowing and I wanted to get higher up on the list.
It just struck me as a really original interesting way to encourage sign ups (presumably for eventual beta testers).
(also you can help my ranking if you click here: http://socialcam.com/?referred_by=BEA3CDhw )
I don't know about you, but I find it extremely tacky to use friendships to sell stuff (and he is selling your time and attention to that company for an invite) even if it doesn't involve money directly.
And that causes me to lower my opinion of both him and (especially) the company. Use sleazily marketing => you are a sleazy company.
But hey thats apparently just me.
Why? Most of the good products I hear about, I hear through friends. Much better than "traditional" advertising.
I'm guessing if the product itself wasn't any good, no one would bother "playing the game". The game is only there to encourage people even more.
In this case it works out fine for both parties. I signed up because I was interested in beta testing and socialcam gets to choose their potential beta testers by how social they are.
For what it's worth the system may not be very effective yet. I have one referral and I've moved from #4000 to #600
I'm based in the UK and am a single-founder, but this sort of thing just makes YC look like an even more compelling experience - all for an under 2 minute, friendly video. Good job!
For us, they made a big point of knowing that our market really existed, even though no company was targeting it yet. In fact, our lack of solid evidence of the market is the main reason for our rejection (W11). However, maybe this was only such a large focus because it was our biggest weakness, and other interviews focus on other things.
Keep in mind that the interview is only 15 minutes, so there don't need to be many questions...