Re:IETF Response to “LS on New IP, Shaping Future Network”
by andrius4669 on Saturday April 04, 2020 @09:57AM
(#22778236)
Re:IETF Response to “LS on New IP, Shaping Future Network”
by geoah on Saturday April 04, 2020 @09:22AM
(#22778070)
Only thing I can find is this http://prod-upp-image-read.ft.com/6f569c60-7045-11ea-89df-41...
Re:IETF Response to “LS on New IP, Shaping Future Network”
by gruez on Saturday April 04, 2020 @01:27PM
(#22779796)
incompetent redaction strikes again!
The redacted text are visible if you highlight over them.
The left reads as:
>Zhe Chen, Chuang Wang, Guanwen Li, Zhe Lou, Sheng Jiang
>Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd
>{chenzhe17, wangchuang, liguanwen, zhe.lou, jiangsheng}@huawei.com
The right reads as
>Alex Galis
>University College London
I can't read the pay-walled ft.com article, but I been hearing people say "kill-switch" on the topic. If there will be a "kill-switch" builtin in the protocol, does that means the "New network" will be more centralized and thus unstable and bad?
I think if the goal is to connect more devices, why not build a completely decentralized P2P network that is cheap, easy to maintain, and user-friendly?