Re:Dear Jeff Bezos, instead of firing me, protect your worke...
by rwmj on Friday April 03, 2020 @01:04PM
(#22771503)
> "rent control" (in the form of not just preventing rents from rising, but also capping the initial lease price landlords are able to ask for) would fix a lot of things.
Why would this stop houses from being left empty? It seems a better idea for stopping housing being left empty is to heavily tax houses which are left empty.
Re:Dear Jeff Bezos, instead of firing me, protect your worke...
by nogabebop23 on Friday April 03, 2020 @01:16PM
(#22771675)
>> because their owner is being irrational
You state this like it's an obvious measure; you're irrational over 2 months is my rational over 2 years.
Vancouver was absolutely booming in February after some of the steam was released in late 2019. Those vacancies are primarily because owners are using the house as a value store. How would caps on initial rental rates help at all? Those same owners would just never list them.
Rather than arbirtrarily cutting owners off at the knees, forcing them out, it would seem easier if you just left the area.
As someone who lives in a housing market where at least 30% of houses + apartments are sitting empty for months/years because their owner is being irrational (i.e. unwilling to drop to a market-clearing price), "rent control" (in the form of not just preventing rents from rising, but also capping the initial lease price landlords are able to ask for) would fix a lot of things.
Of course, anyone who thought the new rules would mean they could no longer profit in the market could get out of the market, selling off their real-estate assets. There'd be no limit on purchase prices for ownership transfer. But, of course, without the hyper-inflated (even though illiquid!) rental income, the units would be inherently less valuable, so they'd lose resale value, too.