Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by dvtrn on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @07:28PM
(#22743938)
I’m not getting into ALL the details but the “repeatedly calling” back and forth between two numbers quite honestly kept me out of jail overseas due to an embarrassing miscommunication and unintended breaking of a local law (backpacking in college, drinks were had, a friend made an ass out of himself if you must know)
I called a local friend, he didn’t answer. I called his wife she didn’t either. Both follow the “don’t answer unknown numbers” rule. As do I.
It wasn’t until I called friend a second time that he answered the phone. His response? “When my wife got a call from the same number back to back is when I started thinking this must be worth my attention.”
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by nkurz on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @09:31PM
(#22744748)
This is a nice example of port-knocking: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Port_knocking.
I wonder if it would be possible to set up something like this more rigorously. Give everyone unrelated two phone numbers. The first never rings the phone. The second only rings if the first was called within the last minute.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by gibspaulding on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @10:30PM
(#22745014)
Or perhaps just a pin they have to enter in order to get the first phone to actually ring. Basically 2fa for the right to bother me.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by dvtrn on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @11:41PM
(#22745413)
With a creative dialplan design one could do this with a private Asterisk installation (asterisk is behind so many of these cheap disposable phone number/voip providers anyway), though I suppose if one wanted to use someone else’s platform and infrastructure it’d be probably less effort with twilio or plivo
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by gruez on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @06:27PM
(#22743410)
>While this is a possible scenario- in my experience most people know to call multiple times - especially if they know that the recipient won’t recognize the number.
I'm surprised robocallers don't do this too
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by jon_richards on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @06:46PM
(#22743581)
Calling once selects for people more likely to fall for the actual scam.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ...
by yellowapple on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @07:00PM
(#22743694)
Also, spamming/scamming in general is a numbers game. It's generally more profitable to move onto the next number on the list than to keep retrying.
I don’t usually answer my phone from unknown numbers, but when I get three calls from the same number within 3 minutes I’ll pick it up.