It's also a bit of a silly point, even if no expensive software existed. Cars will always be more expensive than, say, bakery items...
Re:Signaling as a Service
by julian_digital on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @01:54AM
(#22746108)
Author here:
There's a difference between a high price tag and a high price tag for the sake of signaling wealth / social status. I wouldn't classify professional software as luxury goods (such as jewelry, watches, etc).
But agree that I should have phrased that sentence differently.
Neat blog.
Re:Signaling as a Service
by julian_digital on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @02:35AM
(#22746286)
:)
Re:Signaling as a Service
by paulryanrogers on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @09:04PM
(#22744615)
> The author isn't looking hard enough: professional software frequently goes for many thousands of dollars.
One cannot usually show off software like hardware. In this WFH world that could change. But for now I don't see people paying top dollar for B2C software until there is some visibility.
There was the "I Am Rich" app: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Am_Rich
An app can be expensive not because is a luxury software but because the complexity and the market size, this determines the development cost and the expected revenues per copy.
Re:Signaling as a Service
by satanspastaroll on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @05:50AM
(#22747127)
You don't even have to look that hard; micro-transaction and in-app purchases are mostly all about bragging and showing success
The author isn't looking hard enough: professional software frequently goes for many thousands of dollars.