News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by SketchySeaBeast on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @05:16PM (#22742684)
I'm struggling with the decision of whether to automatically block anyone not in my contact list and leave a message in my voicemail explaining why. Don't want to be unfriendly, but it's only getting more ridiculous.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by p2t2p on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @06:51PM (#22743634)
> Don't want to be unfriendly

Given my experience with robocall and stuff, I _do_ want to be unfriendly. I hate to guts that a lot of people assume that they can interrupt you at any given moment. One guy called me when I was driving and wasn't having any of that, kept on complaining that I didn't pick up.

My current plan right now is to have a landline number from my internet provider (that's SIP essentially). Whenever anybody requires a phone number give that.

Now, there will be an voice mail device on my side with message: "Hello, you've reached p2t2p and his wife. We _DO_ _NOT_ appreciate your call. If you think your message is important, leave a message and we maybe, just maybe call you back. Otherwise, use email please".

And that is not even for bloody robocalls. Every single bloody prick think they are important enough to steal my time. Hey, I wrote you an email so respond to email, dumbass, don't call me. There were one windows installation company that stopped interacting with as soon as I told them that I won't pick up the phone and asked them to use email.

I guess the ultimate solution is to have my iPhone in permanent "contacts only" mode.

Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by macintux on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @07:50PM (#22744113)
I’ve been paying for Vonage for 10-15 years now so I can keep my old landline phone number active to give out to businesses. Haven’t had a phone hooked up to it for nearly all that time. Voicemail + transcription works great.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by koolba on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @08:57PM (#22744567)
You can get that for free with a google voice number. If you can’t port directly, the indirect method is to sign up for a PAYGO mobile phone and port your number there as an interim hop.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by macintux on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @10:22PM (#22744978)
I don’t trust Google with my email. Not going to trust them with my voicemail.

(Yes, I know, a significant portion of my email ends up in their hands anyway.)

Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by grahamburger on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @05:18PM (#22742705)
Recent versions of Android have an option to automatically screen callers who are not in your contact list. The caller gets a robot asking them why they're calling, and you can view the transcript of their response in real time and decide whether or not to answer.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by SketchySeaBeast on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @05:22PM (#22742750)
I thought that was Pixel only option - I'll have to dig in and see if it's available on a Samsung.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by ChuckMcM on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @05:24PM (#22742769)
As I recall this was a Google Voice feature as well.

My mobile carrier puts "scam likely" on calls that its algorithms have determined are likely spam, I wish there was an android option to just not ring the phone if that was the caller ID name.

Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by bonestamp2 on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @05:39PM (#22742915)
My carrier was doing that but I haven't seen it on any spam calls lately.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by unclebucknasty on Wednesday April 01, 2020 @01:18AM (#22745928)
I've used this feature and each time it occurs to me that the next step for spammers will likely be to simply leave the message, as they will still get an impression via the transcript.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by texasbigdata on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @07:12PM (#22743789)
It's nice but buggy!
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by zszugyi on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @05:40PM (#22742939)
I did try it for a bit, but it was annoying when Uber drivers and delivery people were trying to reach me.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by frank2 on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @08:45PM (#22744487)
Maybe we should lobby Uber to add functionality to their mobile app to eliminate the need for a legacy phone call.

Maybe after a few popular apps do that, the phone companies will start to fear losing relevance and finally take effective action against phone spam.

Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by SketchySeaBeast on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @05:51PM (#22743051)
Yeah, that's my fear as well - I'd miss signal in the noise filtering.
Re:FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by ... by alistairSH on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @05:19PM (#22742721)
I did this as soon as the iPhone offered it.

It only bit me once in several years - I was expecting a call-back from a doctor and they weren't in my contacts. Missed their call, which caused a several hour delay and some annoyance (thankfully not for something critical).