News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Machine translation of cortical activity to text with enc... by akanet on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @08:42AM (#22736929)
Neuralink is even more speculative - they want to embed like a thousand tiny metal filaments deep into your brain.
Re:Machine translation of cortical activity to text with enc... by 2008guy on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @08:52AM (#22737001)
How do you place electrodes without metal filaments? It’s been validated in monkeys.
Re:Machine translation of cortical activity to text with enc... by mattkrause on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @09:05AM (#22737087)
Is that true?

There was a throwaway comment about that at a press conference and lots of rumors (positive and negative), but the white paper only mentions “monkey” once—-and in a reference to another group’s paper.

Re:Machine translation of cortical activity to text with enc... by 2008guy on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @09:43AM (#22737443)
Elon musk said on stage that they had put it in a monkey and had the monkey move a cursor with it. I’ve been following musk very closely since 2010 and he’s never blatantly lied so I think this will not be the first time. He has made errors about timelines and etc but never, ever blatantly lied about something so concrete. And it’s plausible to boot.
Re:Machine translation of cortical activity to text with enc... by mattkrause on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @11:04AM (#22738178)
Not to swing my credentials around, but I actually record neural activity, from monkey brains, for a living.

It can be unexpectedly hard in so many different ways. The dura covering the monkey brain is much tougher, the brain itself is larger, more convoluted, and moves more, even just from breathing and heartbeats). The animals have busy, clever little fingers, so the interface itself needs to be mechanically robust and durable because these implants need to last for years.

I certainly want this to be true: with the exception of neuropixels, electrode technology has been depressingly stagnant. On the other hand, I need to see data before I get too excited and if I did have it, I'd be shouting it from the rooftops.

Re:Machine translation of cortical activity to text with enc... by erohead on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @10:39AM (#22737919)
> never blatantly lied.

Funding secured

Re:Machine translation of cortical activity to text with enc... by morelisp on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @01:23PM (#22739899)
This is merely a mistatement of fact. Lying is what the poors do!
Re:Machine translation of cortical activity to text with enc... by 2008guy on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @04:30PM (#22742196)
It wasn’t a lie...
Re:Machine translation of cortical activity to text with enc... by bognition on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @09:10AM (#22737130)
you need something that conducts electricity. There are groups that use silicon implants.
Re:Machine translation of cortical activity to text with enc... by bognition on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @09:07AM (#22737096)
This isn't new at all. Groups have been doing this for decades. Neuralink wants to mass produce the devices.
Re:Machine translation of cortical activity to text with enc... by mattkrause on Tuesday March 31, 2020 @12:10PM (#22738973)
People have been recording brain activity for decades, but the scale is very different. Until about 10-15 years ago, most labs were using a handful of electrodes (my PhD work, for example, was done with 1-2 at a time). With cheaper amplifiers, it's become more common to use arrays with ~32-96 electrodes and they're often implanted chronically in the brain.

Neuropixels are fairly new and offer ~300 channels (selectable from ~1000). The neuralink thing would increase this another 10-fold.