Re:Microsoft: Cloud services demand up, prioritization rules...
by bobthepanda on Sunday March 29, 2020 @05:26PM
(#22722915)
To be fair, a situation where every single company in the world needed to ramp up on the cloud at the same time is completely unprecedented, and spending the money to do it would've been considered a fools' errand.
If people weren't on the cloud, you'd see them scrambling for physical hardware, which also isn't exactly easy to come by on extremely short notice when the world's logistic chains are under stress as well.
Re:Microsoft: Cloud services demand up, prioritization rules...
by djannzjkzxn on Sunday March 29, 2020 @09:48PM
(#22724494)
I think given the growth these cloud providers are having every year, expanding to meet the needs of a temporary increase in demand looks more like moving forward projects that were already planned. It’s not like they are going to have to build a bunch of datacenters they will never need again.
Re:Microsoft: Cloud services demand up, prioritization rules...
by loeg on Sunday March 29, 2020 @07:46PM
(#22723816)
The article probably overstates actual increase in demand, picking some small subunit which has experienced outsized increased use. They may well want to continue expanding their core hardware capacity at 20%+ annually.
Of course now everyone realizes it's a big sham and neither Amazon nor Microsoft are stupid enough to spend a trillion capex on building the datacenters, fiber lines and so on you need to handle a temporary 700% pandemic situation. In a year from now, they don't want that stuff on their quarterly report just as companies going "cloud only" don't want it.