What it's like building a real website in Node.js

Re:What it's like building a real website in Node.js by mjs on Monday February 28, 2011 @08:23AM (#2271100)

If you have a function foo() that takes a callback as an argument i.e. something like:

  foo(..., function (n) {
     // closure over q, r, s
  });

Then what you can do is create a separate function, bar() that takes q, r, s as an argument, and returns a function:

  function bar(q, r, s) {
    return function(n) {
      // still has dependency on q, r, s
    }
  }

Once you have bar(), the foo() call above can be written as:

  foo(..., bar(q, r, s));

and you save one level of nesting. (This also makes the dependencies explicit, which is helpful.)

The main loop of

https://github.com/ithinkihaveacat/node-fishback/blob/ce5f9c...

does quite a lot of this, if you want a real example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:What it's like building a real website in Node.js by jlyke on Monday February 28, 2011 @10:53AM (#2271590)

This technique reminds me of Lambda Lifting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambda_lifting

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:What it's like building a real website in Node.js by svetlyak40wt on Monday February 28, 2011 @12:28PM (#2271970)

Why not to write it in a much simplier way? Like this:

  function bar(n) {
    // still has dependency on q, r, s
  }
  foo(..., bar);

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:What it's like building a real website in Node.js by mjs on Monday February 28, 2011 @01:01PM (#2272097)

Yeah, that's nicer if bar() can be defined at the same "level" as foo() but if it makes more sense to move it somewhere else the closed-over variables need to be passed.

[ Parent | on HN ]