Re:Little Snitch and the deprecation of kernel extensions
by rasteau on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @05:44PM
(#22679372)
The trade off is not installing Little Snitch.
Re:Little Snitch and the deprecation of kernel extensions
by philistine on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @05:41PM
(#22679341)
A gaming machine with no personal data on it. We call that a console, and they are indeed built for speed above all else.
Re:Little Snitch and the deprecation of kernel extensions
by Hamuko on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @05:43PM
(#22679362)
Consoles are really built for a price point above all else. Hence why they're always lacking in performance compared to contemporary gaming PCs.
Re:Little Snitch and the deprecation of kernel extensions
by sitkack on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @06:14PM
(#22679658)
They also take security very very seriously.
Re:Little Snitch and the deprecation of kernel extensions
by StavrosK on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @07:05PM
(#22680015)
Consoles take DRM safety seriously, the fact that that aligns with user security is purely coincidental.
Re:Little Snitch and the deprecation of kernel extensions
by m463 on Wednesday March 25, 2020 @06:09AM
(#22683258)
Except companies are really quite adept at identifying the person connected to all the "no personal data".
Re:Little Snitch and the deprecation of kernel extensions
by kyuudou on Tuesday March 24, 2020 @07:12PM
(#22680061)
Correct, it's an inversely proportional relationship, security vs. convenience and/or performance. I could care less if my gaming box gets owned but many others are much more serious about their gaming and would hence have other workarounds.
Also not like limiting vulnerabilities to user space is always a big improvement. If someone hacks my user account on a single user computer, they have access to all the data I care about anyway. They could ransomeware my stuff even without kernel access.