News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:About that Hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19 trial by ncmncm on Monday March 23, 2020 @06:31AM (#22662621)
In particular, if it turns out to reduce infection rate, taking it prophylactically will save the lives of everyone who would otherwise die for lack of a ventilator, or who would die even with one. If it does not turn out to reduce infection rate, no harm done.

If it turns out to shorten the illness, everyone sick, and also everyone taking it prophylactically who is actually infected but asymptomatic, will reduce their contagion rate by joining the ranks of the non-contagious sooner, reducing everyone's risk. If it does not turn out to shorten the illness, no harm done.

Chloroquine is well-known. If it caused an unacceptable rate of liver failure we would already know.

I see suggestions that it takes a very high doses to work. But that might be so only for the already severe infections they are using it on. It should be easy enough to discover whether low doses work prophylactically, and safe enough to try them while waiting on results.

Re:About that Hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19 trial by joe_fishfish on Monday March 23, 2020 @06:38AM (#22662663)
What if it turns out to shorten the illness in 80% of cases but cause liver failure in the other 20%?
Re:About that Hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19 trial by learc83 on Monday March 23, 2020 @06:50AM (#22662741)
It's a well known drug. We already know the side effects.
Re:About that Hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19 trial by kl4m on Monday March 23, 2020 @07:30AM (#22662969)
Not on people with COVID-19.
Re:About that Hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19 trial by tyingq on Monday March 23, 2020 @07:02AM (#22662814)
Hydroxychloroquine is significantly less hepatoxic than chloroquine.