News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Army Corps of Engineers to Build Temporary Hospitals in NY by jacquesm on Sunday March 22, 2020 @04:23PM (#22658282)
Be concerned all you want, but look at it this way: without the most populous nations (for instance, the USA) at the top of a list like this politicians can downplay the seriousness of the threat. HN has a small army of people who do nothing else than trying to make it seem like this is 'just a flu', or something slightly worse.

All of that taken together translates into people simply ignoring the danger and continuing their life making things much worse in the long run.

Viruses don't have legs, they need people to transport them. And as long as we're willing it gets spread around and some people will die. If rankings like these send the message loud and clear that this also concerns you then I'm all for the rankings, even if they are a bs statistic without taking into account the total population size. People find it much easier to relate to 5000 people dead than they do to 2000 people per million infected.

Re:Army Corps of Engineers to Build Temporary Hospitals in NY by systemvoltage on Sunday March 22, 2020 @04:28PM (#22658330)
Agreed that we need to spread the message far and wide. Just slamming down on people that are doing their best to cope with this situation isn't very productive, if not discouraging and harmful. In these times, Solidarity is needed. Just the way we support Italian crisis, we need to do the same to the US and the rest of the countries.

Slam governments, take it up on the streets to address issues after this pandemic is over.

Re:Army Corps of Engineers to Build Temporary Hospitals in NY by adventured on Sunday March 22, 2020 @07:51PM (#22659939)
> without the most populous nations (for instance, the USA) at the top of a list like this politicians can downplay the seriousness of the threat

That doesn't make any sense. First, it's not desirable in any way for the US to be near the top of that list. That's a per capita list (for obvious reasons it's better for small nations to dominate that list) and the US has a spread out and very low population density compared to most nations in eg Europe. Having a high population nation doesn't inherently correlate to being near the top of the per capita infection list.

Population density is not your friend when it comes to a highly infectious virus spreading in the population.

Countries in Europe vs the US on population density:

The Netherlands 12x, Belgium 11x, UK 9x, Germany 7x, Switzerland 6x, Italy 6x, France 4x, Poland 4x, Spain 3x.

The US also has no primate cities, whereas Europe has ~25 of them (hyper population concentration). Most nations in Europe have a primate city that dominates the nation in terms of population, acting as a massive potential infection supercenter.

It's entirely unsurprising that smaller European nations with high population densities vs the US would have higher infection rates per capita.