News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Praise of Phone Calls by toast0 on Friday March 20, 2020 @04:30PM (#22641347)
If you've got good enough wired internet, a voip based "landline" is pretty inexpensive, and if you run with the G.711 codec, it's basically landline equivalent, with a small latency penalty (much less than cellphone though).

In theory G.722 (AMR-wideband, aka "HD voice") is coming to cell phones via VoLTE and is also available (in theory) via VoIP providers, and should be better than landline quality, but with added latency. Of course, once enough steps have added latency it becomes noticeable, but perhaps the increased frequency range makes it worthwhile; and it requires interop work between carriers.

Re:In Praise of Phone Calls by doctorshady on Friday March 20, 2020 @05:26PM (#22641817)
The AMR wideband codec is G.722.2 - it's separate from the ADPCM implementation standardized as G.722. The two sound quite different.

Everyone's ears are different, but I can't say I've been crazy about AMR wideband. Linear predictive coding in general has that characteristic underwater sound.

Re:In Praise of Phone Calls by timthorn on Friday March 20, 2020 @04:58PM (#22641593)
Wideband AMR has been available for a decade on 3G, Eg https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11138503
Re:In Praise of Phone Calls by toast0 on Friday March 20, 2020 @05:00PM (#22641608)
Being available and actually being used when making calls are unfortunately two different things.
Re:In Praise of Phone Calls by timthorn on Friday March 20, 2020 @05:34PM (#22641885)
It's certainty been in service on the network I use for many years. It is noticeable when I call another enabled endpoint.