The wrap-around scrolling made it unusable for me, but I'm assuming that will be fixed somehow. Looks great, and I'm going to forward it to some of my friends once the wrap-around is working.

There isn't anything wrong with the wrap-around. If you're at the top of the list you shouldn't scroll up, you should be scrolling down towards the bottom.

Have you watched someone actually use your app? Here's how it went for me: start at the top, scroll down a few days, scroll back up to the top, somehow end up scrolled back weeks. It's arbitrary to loop after a few days -- if you could collect data going back to the beginning of each company's history, that might be more sensible.

I don't see any real-world analogue to going forward from the present and ending up several weeks in the past, and having to embrace a brand-new paradigm in order to use the interface is perhaps not what you need to do to your users.

The list of items goes back the latest 100 items. When you are scrolling towards the bottom and you reach the end, it brings you back to the top.

After asking your users for feedback, it's generally useful to listen to them.

Here you have a sample of users who are saying the wrap-around navigation is totally broken for them.

What's the right answer to that? Hint: it's not: "No, you're wrong, it works fine."

I was just explaining the idea behind it. I'm not disagreeing. I'm removing the scrolling mechanism for the article list completely.

Really really unintuitive.

User: Feature X makes it unusable for me. Developer: There isn't anything wrong with feature X.

That is not a very healthy attitude towards feedback... good luck training users to do something they don't want. You have to account for dumb user behaviour and prevent unexpected results.

Thank you. Yes, I understand. With all of the scrolling buttons I was sort of torn between which direction to go. It seemed that both made sense and I really couldn't know what users would expect.