News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on London’s trees are saving the city billions. Parent comment

Re:London’s trees are saving the city billions by Shoue on Sunday March 15, 2020 @10:07AM (#22583545)
Why not follow Singapore and have both? Any greenery you cut down to build something must be replaced, and in Singapore that happens to be replaced by becoming part of the building itself. It's a very unique, and IMO, cool look when the skyscrapers have an open garden halfway through, or gardens on top with greenery down the sides.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:London’s trees are saving the city billions by desert_boi on Sunday March 15, 2020 @11:13AM (#22583878)
Singapore does have a climate where without those trees it would be crazy hot walking. It was ~36C in October when I was there in October.

I sweated through my shirts immediately going outside. But my home state in the winter ranges between 0C and 15C in October.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:London’s trees are saving the city billions by zip1234 on Sunday March 15, 2020 @10:13AM (#22583577)
NYC would be so amazing with greenery integrated into the cityscape more
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:London’s trees are saving the city billions by Shounak on Sunday March 15, 2020 @01:04PM (#22584644)
I hope this will happen soon. NYC passed a green roof law in Nov. 2019 that requires all new or extensively renovated buildings to install gardens, urban agriculture, or solar on their roofs.

https://www.citylandnyc.org/29502-2/

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:London’s trees are saving the city billions by scarejunba on Sunday March 15, 2020 @01:51PM (#22585111)
Loads of SF streets are hyper industrial and have no trees. It's strange what an effect it has. Walking through SOMA feels weirdly like being in a concrete video game. Walking through my neighbourhood in Glen Park is lovely and charming.

I work near the new building at 1550 mission and they've put trees down in front of that building and the street is instantly nicer.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:London’s trees are saving the city billions by giancarlostoro on Sunday March 15, 2020 @12:49PM (#22584476)
Any city really. Imagine gardens at rooftops and some window vegetable gardens being more common place or balcony gardens.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:London’s trees are saving the city billions by ip26 on Sunday March 15, 2020 @03:57PM (#22586183)
Policies like that are well intentioned but in many places there can be a pattern of knocking it all down & rebuilding every 30-50 years. In other words, just as the trees start to get large, you cut them all down once more.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:London’s trees are saving the city billions by nashashmi on Monday March 16, 2020 @09:43AM (#22592567)
I am for a situation where we constantly plant new trees and 30 years later knock them down and plant new ones. Correct me if I am wrong, but younger trees grow faster and sequester more carbon.

Secondly, this attitude about not cutting trees is causing many trees from not getting planted. Because there are utilities that lie underneath and if they need to be repaired 15 years later, trees are in the way.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:London’s trees are saving the city billions by qtplatypus on Sunday March 15, 2020 @09:59PM (#22588968)
In the story it mentions that. Older trees are better then younger trees.
[ Parent | on HN ]