News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: Is UK government insane or genius? by knzhou on Sunday March 15, 2020 @02:13AM (#22581694)
In the UK, "maths" is a very broad category. It includes my field of theoretical particle physics, as well as mathematical disease modelling. All of us would be called mathematicians.

Yes, not everybody signing is a specialist in epidemiology, but so what? The point is that a good number are -- there is no clear consensus among UK experts for the UK government's position. And among global experts, there is a clear consensus against their position.

Re:Ask HN: Is UK government insane or genius? by starfallg on Sunday March 15, 2020 @03:41AM (#22582013)
>there is no clear consensus among UK experts for the UK government's position

Well there is a huge government drive to portray that this is the case right now.

Whenever that happens, it always arouses suspicion that something is not quite right.

As a group, it's hard to imagine that UK experts in Epidemiology and related fields deviates significantly from their peers globally.

Re:Ask HN: Is UK government insane or genius? by poka on Sunday March 15, 2020 @03:39AM (#22582008)
Keep signing petitions from ivory towers. That's not where political pressure on decision makers comes from.
Re:Ask HN: Is UK government insane or genius? by _puk on Sunday March 15, 2020 @03:47AM (#22582029)
Just in case you were not aware, in the UK any official petition with more than 100,000 signatures gets discussed in parliament [0].

0: https://petition.parliament.uk/help

Re:Ask HN: Is UK government insane or genius? by starfallg on Sunday March 15, 2020 @03:53AM (#22582052)
The plan is supposed to be based on science, not politics, yet here you are telling me this isn't the case?

On a more serious note, petitions and other methods by experts to publicly state a position isn't just about influencing government policy. It's also a political tool in the aftermath of failed policy. Just like the current panel of experts is a political tool employed by the government to justify the biases in its policy.