Hit 2. Only 1 crashed. You wrote "lost". A plane that flies back to base isn't "lost."

Also, the US didn't deny that they lost any for decades. I remember the news footage (in the US) of the night it was shot down.

You have a peculiar axe to grind here. Are you trying to sell radar systems or something?

A propaganda poster knowingly conflating the words stealth and invisible, a distinction its intended audience wouldn't be able to make, to mock the enemy? I think I'll stick with the Wikipedia source.

And even that says: Some American sources state that a second F-117A was damaged during the same campaign, allegedly on 30 April 1999;[61] the aircraft returned to base, but it supposedly never flew again.[62][63]

Point is with AA missile is that getting them "on target" is almost as effective as a hit. target has to deploy its counter measures and return home, else next time they are destroyed.

I was addressing the dubious choice of sources delivered with arrogance and condescension. Couldn't care less about how many airplanes did Serbia take down.

so you otherwise accept the Serbians/passive radar got the entire F117 fleet mothballed?

I was addressing the dubious choice of sources delivered with arrogance and condescension. Couldn't care less about how many airplanes did Serbia take down.